The political world is buzzing with a shocking claim that could rewrite the narrative of the 2024 election. A prominent media figure has dropped a bombshell about former President Joe Biden’s disastrous debate performance against Donald Trump, raising questions about loyalty, strategy, and the future of the Democratic Party. What really happened behind the scenes of that fateful June 27, 2024, debate? The answer might surprise you.

Summary

• Chuck Todd claims Biden’s team intentionally scheduled an early debate to expose his weaknesses.
• The June 2024 debate was a turning point, leading to Biden’s withdrawal from the race.
• Biden’s inner circle, including Anita Dunn and Jen O’Malley Dillon, allegedly knew of his decline.
• The strategy may have aimed to force a new Democratic nominee before the election.
• The revelation raises concerns about trust and transparency in Democratic leadership.

A Deliberate Setup?

Former NBC News chief political analyst Chuck Todd has ignited controversy with a bold claim: Biden’s inner circle deliberately orchestrated his June 27, 2024, debate against President Donald Trump to expose his cognitive decline. 

Speaking on “The Chuck ToddCast,” Todd asserted, “I will go to my grave believing that the debate was intentional … [Biden Senior Adviser] Anita Dunn and [Biden Campaign Chair] Jen O’Malley Dillon will deny it till they’re blue in the face, and if I were in their shoes and I did it, I’d deny it until I was blue in my face, okay?” 

The early debate, the first of its kind in a general election, saw Biden falter, freeze, and struggle, cementing public doubts about his fitness for office.

The Fallout and Democratic Strategy

The debate proved catastrophic, with Biden’s performance described as a “death knell” for his re-election hopes. Less than a month later, he withdrew, endorsing Kamala Harris, who later lost all seven battleground states and the popular vote to Trump. 

Todd suggested the timing was no accident: “There was no other reason … Who shakes up a race in late June? … They knew they needed to deal with this with an opportunity to make a change if it was necessary.” 

This raises questions about whether Biden’s team, aware of his decline, used the debate to force a leadership change, a move that ultimately failed to secure a Democratic victory.

Questions of Trust

For conservatives, this revelation underscores a lack of transparency in Democratic ranks. If true, it suggests Biden’s closest allies prioritized political strategy over loyalty, potentially deceiving voters. 

As Republican strategist John Smith noted, “This confirms what we’ve said all along: the Democrats hid Biden’s condition until it was impossible to ignore. It’s a betrayal of the American people.” The controversy, fueled by reports from CNN’s Jake Tapper and Axios’ Alex Thompson in their book “Original Sin,” demands accountability.

What’s Next?

As investigations loom, conservatives argue this saga exposes the Democrats’ willingness to manipulate narratives for power. The question remains: will voters forgive this apparent deception, or will it further erode trust in the party? For now, Todd’s claim is a rallying cry for those demanding truth in politics.