The high-profile trial of Sean “Diddy” Combs, a music mogul facing serious charges, has taken a dramatic turn in Manhattan federal court. As jurors began deliberating, an unexpected issue has raised questions about the case’s outcome, leaving conservatives and law-and-order advocates watching closely.

Summary

• Jury deliberations in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ sex trafficking and racketeering trial began June 30, 2025, but hit a snag within hours.
• A juror, identified as No. 25, is reportedly unable to follow Judge Arun Subramanian’s legal instructions, prompting concern.
• The judge responded with a note reminding jurors of their duty to deliberate and adhere to his guidance.
• Combs, facing life in prison if convicted, denies all charges, including racketeering and sex trafficking.
• The trial, spanning seven weeks, has drawn attention for its graphic testimony and high stakes.

Juror Chaos Threatens Justice

Just 70 minutes into deliberations, the jury foreperson sent a note to Judge Arun Subramanian, stating, “We have a juror, No. 25, who we believe cannot follow your honor’s instructions.” 

This alarming development has sparked concerns about the integrity of the deliberation process in a case that could see Combs imprisoned for life. The juror, described as a male scientist, has not been identified further, but the issue underscores the challenges of ensuring impartiality in such a high-stakes trial.

Judge Takes Action

Judge Subramanian, known for his no-nonsense approach, swiftly responded after conferring with both prosecution and defense teams. He sent a note back to the jury, emphasizing their obligation to follow his legal instructions and urging them to continue deliberating. 

“We can always ratchet it up. We can’t ratchet it down,” defense attorney Marc Agnifilo cautioned, advocating for a measured response to avoid escalating tensions. The judge’s firm stance aligns with conservative values of upholding judicial authority and ensuring trials remain fair and orderly.

Case Under Scrutiny

Combs, 55, faces charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking, and transportation for prostitution, all of which he denies. The trial, which began in May, has featured testimony from over 30 witnesses, including graphic accounts from two ex-girlfriends. 

Prosecutors allege Combs led a criminal enterprise, while his defense argues the case is overblown. As deliberations continue, five alternate jurors remain on standby, ready to step in if needed.

What’s Next?

The disruption caused by Juror No. 25 raises questions about whether a fair verdict can be reached. 

“Deliberations can get incredibly heated and that’s part of the process,” legal expert Tuerkheimer noted, warning that removing a juror now could fuel appeals if Combs is convicted.